Feeds:
Posts
Comments

The Long and Winding Road, Part 1

Dear readers,

I am an urban planner by training and a public transportation promoter by personal avocation. I make no secret of my preference in the following look at local highway development and the issue’s regional relevance in the Ontario election.

In scanning the environment of Waterloo Region for citizen issues to write about on Campaign Tales, I noticed signs on my drives to Brantford promoting a cause I’d not heard of: Stop the 424. My curiosity triggered, I soon discovered that rabbit hole led to a curious wonderland of political acquiescence.

In the context of Waterloo Region’s continued growth, two major highway plans have attracted voters’ attention. But there’s little evidence of any political debate, largely it seems, due to the apparent unanimity among the three major parties’ candidates.

The Ministry of Transportation is currently examining a proposal to build a 400-series style highway from Highway 401 in southern Puslinch, along the eastern edge of Cambridge, and along the Grand River valley to Highway 403 in Brantford. The plan is to provide an alternate, high-speed route between the two centres, taking pressure off of Highway 24, which runs as a two-lane country highway through the township of North Dumfries and into Brant County. The highway would connect the industries of Brantford and Cambridge to the network of 400 series highways throughout the province, and it would likely contribute to urban sprawl, especially along the eastern side of Cambridge, as real estate could be marketed to commuters wanting proximity to the fast route to Toronto.

The Ministry of Transportation has not given this highway an official designation, but its location next to Highway 24 and its 400-series-highway standards have enabled opponents to label it Highway “424.” The concern is that the highway will increase traffic locally, cut into environmentally sensitive areas in the Grand River valley, and adversely affect such rural communities as St. George.

It was easy enough to get an interview with the local Green Party candidate in Cambridge Colin Carmichael. He says his party puts public transit first and wants a five year moratorium on highway development: “Adding highway capacity will never resolve gridlock issues because new highways (and lane expansions) actually encourage people to drive more often which means that new highway capacity is always behind demand.”

Contacting incumbent Conservative MPP Gerry Martiniuk for his views proved near impossible; nobody answers the phone at his campaign headquarters, and my messages left on the office’s answering machine were not returned. Likewise his Liberal opponent, Kathryn McGarry, has proven difficult to get a hold of. Even the New Democratic candidate Mitchel Healey failed to return my calls after initially expressing an interest in talking to me.

Now, I realize that all of the candidates have busy schedules to maintain during an election campaign, and I also realize that I’m a “citizen journalist” (read: unpaid) for a website rather than a “real” journalist for a mainstream newspaper. But I cannot help but wonder if this wall of silence is deliberate, to avoid tough questions on the very need for new highway development in southwestern Ontario. I also wonder whether planners and politicians are doing enough to grow our urban centres in a more compact and pedestrian friendly manner that makes public transportation options viable and reduces the need for new highway development.

Tomorrow: The Long and Winding Road , Part 2. In Waterloo Region political pavement stifles public transportation debate

4 Responses

  1. on October 6, 2007 at 2:27 pm | Reply Vincent Clement

    In the government transit utopia of Europe, plenty of highways are being built between urban areas. They go through mountains, under cities, over or under rivers and over valleys. So, despite the supposed amazing system of high-speed rail, intercity rail and light rail transit systems, Europeans are busy adding hundreds of kilometres of roadways to their highway system. They realize that goods still have be moved around.

    You know that the Province has deemed the KW – Guelph – Brantford – Woodstock area as the next area of urban growth. Even if the area had one of the best government transit systems in the world, you are still going to need to efficient and safe highways between the main areas. Better to secure those corridors now when land is cheaper. Besides those corridors could also double as transit corridors.


  2. Thank you for sharing the details. I found the info really helpful.


  3. Now, I realize that all of the candidates have busy schedules to maintain during an election campaign, and I also realize that I’m a “citizen journalist” (read: unpaid) for a website rather than a “real” journalist for a mainstream newspaper.


  4. I don’t want a highway. I can’t drive my tractor on it. Too many people live on it instead of dying in car crashes like they should.

    O wait.

    Highways don’t make cars…. What an odd notion.

    What?!?

    Increasing populations correlate with increasing number of vehicles on the road? NO! This can’t be?!? Somebody better put a stop to this! STOP THE FREEWAY! Then the developers will stop bribing politicians to continue the unsustainable practise of urban sprawl!

    Oh wait. Its actually the other way around. Governments race to remedy a backlog of needed freeways that were put to the sidelines in the 70s and 80s so all that public transit (you know… the couple of Go Train routes) could be established with lacklustre service every hour.

    Freeways cause half as many deaths per million vehicles and a quarter of the number of accidents (though I will admit, accidents on freeways are twice as likely to be deadly).

    They reduce the cost per kilometre of shipping significantly, encouraging the growth of the manufacturing industry in Ontario. They are recession-combating make-work projects which invest millions into our economy.

    Freeways don’t make cars, people do. Freeways don’t encourage gridlock, they relieve it. Freeways don’t increase traffic, they funnel it off nearby, lower standard, country roads.

    The two cents of another regional planner.



Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.